At first by my view there should be complete freedom to jump into any competitive exams but by the point of view of less burden yield ratio during the filtration process this might me right but here i am going to share my opinion about 70% criteria in IIMA and 60% in IITs.
First of all, is this really a problem to justify? or it is right .
It is good enough to make a student curious for their future from the starting of the carrier but problem came in focus when we see the graph of marks obtain by the students in different state boards.The marking system is different in different states, so to equalize this problem the concerning authority should have to prepare the proportion of student under this circumstance and than decide what will be the percentage of marks for the same proportion of students in different states. I mean to say that the marking boundary should be different for different boards. Its the duty of state board to make the continuous contact with these deciding authority for the info. sharing.
Alternative way to overcome this problem to give the same training for mark evaluation process to each and every teacher, which is actually not economical.
But still i am near the chaos that, is this criteria is good for better filtration or it is just to reduce the burden of filtration. If it is just to reduce the burden then, is it right way to talent hunting?